(UPDATE) “Chi” magazine, owned by bunga bunga former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi has published the photos of Kate Middleton 9/17/12 so MisfitWisdom is showing you the uncensored cover and two photos from that magazine below:
Yes folks. Yet another celebrity caught nude somewhere that’s going to make us all gasp and say to ourselves, “OMG! Another celebrity caught nude somewhere!”
As gasping goes, this really isn’t what I would call a legitimate gasp. Celebrities tend to go nude around various places a lot. Especially if they are secluded and think that no one will see them. Geez, I walk around nude just before taking my daily shower and ya never see me on the cover of a magazine or making headlines.
Then again, I’m not Prince William or Kate Middleton. Not that anyone should care if either of them walk around nude, except those pesky paparazzi reporters who always sneak around trying to catch someone who’s famous nude.
My theory. There should be a “National Nude Walking Around Day” (NNWAD) which would put all of these paparazzi photographers out of business.
This latest incident, if ya call it that, was when a sneaky low down paparazzi photographer caught Kate Middleton nude on a resort that she and husband Prince William were vacationing at in France. The French magazine, “The Closer,” which has nothing to do with the TV program “The Closer,” then published the photographs. (You can see the cover above)
So what’s the big deal? It’s not like they took secret photographs of Queen Elizabeth or something. Then again, if they did publish photographs of Queen Elizabeth nude, who in their right mind, other than some perverted seniors, would buy their magazine.
The “titillating” (pardon the expression) of all this is that the editor of the “Closer” said that the images show Kate, “fully topless” and show her nipples clearly.
OMG!!! nipples…..clearly!!! Ya mean that Kate Middleton actually has nipples? Who woulda’ guessed.
The magazine’s headline on their website was: “World Exclusive” Kate and William in Provence: Oh My God!”
Kind of a lame headline don’t ya think. First of all what the hell does “Provence” in that headline mean? According to the MisfitWisdom dictionary of words that I’m supposed to know the meaning of but flunked English in school, “Provence” in this case, means an area of France founded in 600 BC by the Greeks. Who themselves may or may not have also walked around naked there.
Ok, so why didn’t they just use the headline, ” “World Exclusive: Kate and William in France. Oh My God!” Which still isn’t an attention-getting headline that would entice anyone to buy their magazine. Perhaps something like, “World Exclusive: Kate’s Nipples and Prince William’s Boner From Observing Kate’s Nipples In France: Oh My God!” Kinda catchy don’t ya think.
The magazine’s editor, Laurence Pieau, (pronounced “pew” if you think this story stinks) said, “Harry would feel less alone” when the issue hits the stands. Whatever that means.
(this was in reference to Prince Harry who was also photographed nude, his nipples showing, but nobody gave a rats ass except the paparazzi and Snow White, who, when told that Prince Harry was nude said, “Why that stinkin’ SOB….anything to steal the limelight.”)
Most likely he’s thinking that if Kate and William ever get into one of those marital arguments that all of us married people have every now and then, and Kate makes him sleep on the Royal couch, and he gets horny, he could always take those photos and go into the Royal bathroom and…um…….neverrrrrr mind.
I’ve said this before, and I’ll say it again. What’s the big freakin’ deal over a pair of Royal nipples? Well, actually I never said it with regard to a pair of “Royal” nipples, but nipples in general. EVERYBODY, including most animals have nipples. Do ya see everyone getting freaked out over a guy walking around on a beach with his shirt off and his nipples exposed? NO!
Do ya see anyone getting all bent out of shape and maybe even excited if Kim Kardashian, Lindsay Lohan, Cameron Diaz, Jennifer Lopez, or Roger Rabbit’s girlfriend exposed their nipples? Well, um, I did get a bit excited when Jessica Rabbit wore that revealing dress in that “Roger Rabbit” movie. And that’s only because ya never see naked pictures of cartoon characters. It’s very hard for any paparazzi to get naked photos of cartoon characters because most cartoon characters vacation in “Toon Land” which is off-limits to non cartoon paparazzi.
The bottom line here folks, or top line, is that naked photos of celebrities sell. Just like this blog that will get all kinds of hits today because I used the word, “nipples” and “naked.” Which means that I have a lot of perverts, or frustrated married guys reading this blog today.
The other bottom line is that, if anything, Kate will attract a lot more followers due to those photos, and the “Closer” magazine will sell a lot of magazines.
As I’m also sure that if I continually posted naked photos of anyone on this blog I’d get a lot more readers. The problem with that is that I don’t know any celebrities, I don’t feel like lying in a bunch of tall grass and weeds to wait for the opportune moment to take a photo of anyone naked, and finally, if I did choose to do that, I’d most likely get arrested for being either a stalker or trespassing in a wildlife protected area and upsetting the natural habitat of Piping Plovers or something.
In conclusion, Kate Middleton’s nipples are no different from any other set of women’s nipples, except that these particular nipples are on Kate. Which, are, a Royal set.
Similar to what the Queen may have but that no one, even the paparazzi care about.
Thank Gawd for THAT!
(UPDATE) My potato chip shaped like the “Apple” computer company logo did not sell on eBay. My dreams of becoming rich overnight……. dashed.
(UPDATE) As of 9/16/12 this notice appeared on the “Closer” site:
http://www.Closeronline.co.uk is currently experiencing technical difficulties and we are working to rectify the fault.
Statement from Paul Keenan, Chief Executive of Bauer Media, in connection with the publication by Closer France of pictures of Prince William and his wife, the Duchess of Cambridge.
As the owners of the Closer brand and publishers of Closer magazine we have complained in the strongest terms to the licensee of Closer France, over the publication by them of photographs of their Royal Highnesses, Prince William and the Duchess of Cambridge.
We deplore the publication of these intrusive and offensive pictures and have asked that Closer France takes these pictures down immediately from its website and desist from publishing any further pictures.
Bauer Media and Closer UK regards publication of these photographs as a gross intrusion of their Royal Highnesses’ privacy.
We were not aware in advance of the purchase of these photographs or of any intention to publish. We have absolutely no control over the editorial decisions of Closer France.
In the light of their publication, we are now urgently discussing this matter with our licensee and reviewing the terms of our licence agreement with Closer France.
Like our readers we are appalled and regret the pain the publication of these photographs has caused.
(DONATE) The commoner MisfitWisdom PayPal donate link is posted below. If it is not highlighted, (blue) simply copy and paste the link into your browser to get to the PayPal site. Paparazzi are not allowed at the PayPal site, so, if you choose to wear something low-cut, (women) or go topless, have no fear that you will be photographed. Unless PayPal has one of those little ATM type cameras mounted on their donate machine. Then basically you may see the headline, “World Exclusive: MisfitWisdom Donator Topless: Oh My God!!”
Donations since January 2009 AD………………( 1 )
Copyright 2012 MisfitWisdom RLV